| Home | Introduction | Abbreviations | Bibliography | Smith |
| Search Pt1 | Search Pt2 | Reports Pt1 | Reports Pt2 | Useful Lists Pt1 | Useful Lists Pt2 | Index Pt2 |
| Appeals to the Privy Council from the Caribbean and Canadian Colonies |
| Report No. BAR_1699_01 |
|
Barbados |
| Case Name Long |
George Peers v Jonathan Amory (In re The Turtle) |
Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
| APC Citation | v.2 [747] p.333–334 (31 May 1699 – 11 September 1701) |
| PC Register Citation | William III v.5 (5 May 1697 – 30 March 1700) p.345: PC 2/77/345 |
| PC Register Citation | William III v.6 (4 April 1700 – 19 February 1702) p.57, 123–124, 125, 233, 256: PC 2/78/57, 123–124, 125, 233, 256 |
Colonial Courts |
|
Court of Admiralty of Carolina |
Participants |
|
Amory, Mr. Jonathan, naval officer in Charles Town, Carolina, respondent |
|
|
Cunningham, Robert, master of the Turtle |
|
|
Mountague, Mr. ___, agent for the defendant |
|
|
Peers, George, merchant, of Barbados, owner of the Turtle, appellant |
Vessels |
|
Turtle (sloop) of Barbados |
Description |
Condemnation. |
Disposition |
Committee agrees to hear appeal. No further disposition noted. |
Notes |
The proceedings in this appeal took place in Carolina as the APC margin note and all Privy Council register entries, except the last, indicate. However, the APC indexes the matter as a Barbadian appeal and the final register entry refers to “a sentence in Barbados.” But for the index and final register entry, this appeal would have been solely attributed to Carolina. In fact, a duplicate report of it is found in Part I under South Carolina (12_1699_00), though South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia were not established as separate entities at this date. |
References in Smith, Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations |
Table of Cases (Peers v Amory; In re The Turtle) |
|
|
DOCUMENTATION |
Printed Cases |
Not found |
Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew |
Not found |