Appeals to the Privy Council |
Report No. 13_1696_00 |
Appeal of Bowtell |
Virginia |
Case Name Short |
Bowtell, appeal of |
Not a ‘true’ appeal. |
Case Name Long |
William Bowtell and Thomas Wenborne, appeal of |
Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
APC Citation | v.2 [632] p.299 – 18 June 1696 – entry 1 |
||
CSP Citation | X no. 46 |
PC Register Citation | William III v.4 (2 December 1694 – 23 April 1697) p.451: PC 2/76/451 |
Colonial Courts |
No colonial court decision |
Participants |
Bowtell, William Wenborne, Thomas |
Description |
Not stated in Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
Disposition |
Not stated in Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
Notes |
The petition regards a presumed debt of John Lear, a member of the Virginia Council, who by a rule of the General Court was immune from suit. The petition is of interest, though not an actual appeal from a court judgment. According to Kammen, “Virginia at the Close of the Seventeenth Century,” p.143–144, the “very first piece of business referred to the Board [of Trade] in 1696, before it had held its first meeting, concerned Virginia. . . . The lords commissioners were ordered to report on the case of William Bowtell and Thomas Wenborne, merchants, who raised the issue of privileges enjoyed by councilors in Virginia. . . . In consequence, at their seventh meeting, on July 13, 1696, the Board heard the petition of the two aggrieved parties.” |
|
DOCUMENTATION |
Printed Cases |
Not found |
Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew |
Not found |