Appeals to the Privy Council |
Report No. 08_1735_00 |
Mossesson v Norris |
New York |
Case Name Short |
Mossesson v Norris |
Not a ‘true’ appeal. |
Case Name Long |
Solomon Medina Mossesson, Moses Medina and Abraham Medina, and Roderigo Pacheto v Mathew Norris |
Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
APC Citation | v.3 [341] p.459 – 3 April 1735 – entry 1 |
PC Register Citation | George II v.4 (1 August 1734 – 23 September 1736) p.150: PC 2/93/150 |
Colonial Courts |
Vice Admiralty Court – 4 September 1727 |
Participants |
Medina, Abraham Medina, Moses Mossesson, Solomon Medina Norris, Mathew, esquire Pacheto, Roderigo |
Description |
Condemnation of snuff and tobacco as lawful prize |
Disposition |
Not stated in Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
Notes |
The petition of Mathew Norris requests that the appeal of Solomon Medina Mossesson, Moses Medina and Abraham Medina, and Roderigo Pacheto be dismissed for non-prosecution. Smith (p.188, referencing Norris v Four Casks, etc. of Snuff) states that this appeal was in fact to the Lords Commissioners for Hearing Prize Appeals though the wording in the APC and the entry in Hough, New York Vice-Admiralty 1715–1788, p.8–10, might imply otherwise. |
References in Smith, Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations |
Table of Cases (Norris v Four Casks, etc., of Snuff) |
|
DOCUMENTATION |
Printed Cases |
Not found |
Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew |
Not found |