Appeals to the Privy Council |
Report No. 01_1727_00 |
Winthrop v Lechmere |
Connecticut |
Case Name Short |
Winthrop v Lechmere |
Case Name Long |
John Winthrop v Thomas and Ann Lechmere |
Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.139 – 16 January 1727 – entry 1 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.5 (September 1724 – May 1727) p.297–298: PC 2/89/297–298 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.139 – 8 February 1727 – entry 2 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.5 (September 1724 – May 1727) p.319: PC 2/89/319 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.139 – 18 February 1727 – entry 3 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.5 (September 1724 – May 1727) p.330: PC 2/89/330 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.139–140 – 18 February 1727 – entry 4 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.5 (September 1724 – May 1727) p.330–331: PC 2/89/330–331 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.140 – 28 March 1727 – entry 5 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.5 (September 1724 – May 1727) p.338–339: PC 2/89/338–339 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.140 – 13 May 1727 – entry 6 |
PC Register Citation | George I v.5 (September 1724 – May 1727) p.357–358: PC 2/89/357–358 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.140 – 21 November 1727 – entry 7 |
PC Register Citation | George II v.1 (14 June 1727 – 22 May 1729) p.186–187: PC 2/90/186–187 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.140 – 16 December 1727 – entry 8 |
PC Register Citation | George II v.1 (14 June 1727 – 22 May 1729) p.193: PC 2/90/193 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.140–150 – 20 December 1727 – entry 9 |
PC Register Citation | George II v.1 (14 June 1727 – 22 May 1729) p.195–202: PC 2/90/195–202 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.150 – 13 February 1728 – entry 10 |
PC Register Citation | George II v.1 (14 June 1727 – 22 May 1729) p.230–231: PC 2/90/230–231 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.150 – 19 November 1728 – entry 11 |
PC Register Citation | George II v.1 (14 June 1727 – 22 May 1729) p.390–391: PC 2/90/390–391 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.150 – 27 November 1728 – entry 12 |
PC Register Citation | George II v.1 (14 June 1727 – 22 May 1729) p.398: PC 2/90/398 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.150 – 4 December 1728 – entry 13 |
PC Register Citation | George II v.1 (14 June 1727 – 22 May 1729) p.404: PC 2/90/404 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.151 – 4 December 1728 – entry 14 |
PC Register Citation | George II v.1 (14 June 1727 – 22 May 1729) p.407: PC 2/90/407 |
APC Citation | v.3 [112] p.151 – 11 December 1728 – entry 15 |
PC Register Citation | George II v.1 (14 June 1727 – 22 May 1729) p.411: PC 2/90/411 |
Colonial Courts |
Court of Probates – county of New London – 21 February 1717/1718 – letters of administration of estate granted to Winthrop Superior Court – judgments for Winthrop on multiple actions of Lechmere brought in July 1724 General Assembly – 1725 – Lechmere’s petition for relief and a new trial Assembly – 1725 – order for a complete inventory of Wait Winthrop’s estate in Court of Probates Court of Probates – 29 June 1725 – refusal to accept Winthrop’s inventory without real estate, from which judgment Winthrop appeals Court of Probates – Lechmere brings suit to have administration of estate granted to him which, being stayed, leads Lechmere to appeal to Superior Court Superior Court – 28 September 1725 – affirmance of action of Court of Probates and order for both real and personal property to be inventoried, from which Winthrop appeals for review to Superior Court Superior Court – 22 March 1725/6 – affirmance of their judgment of 28 September 1725 and on Lechmere’s review grant of power of administration to Lechmere Special Superior County Court – 29 April 1726 – approves Lechmere’s inventory of the estate Assembly – 12 May 1726 – receipt of Lechmere’s petitions for right to sell land to pay debt of deceased Governor – receipt of protest from Winthrop Assembly – May 1726 – passage of an act empowering Lechmere to sell the land to pay the remaining debt and finding Winthrop in contempt Superior Court – September 1726 – issuance of an order pursuant to the passing of the May Act of Assembly allowing the sale of land |
Participants |
Dummer, Jeremiah (agent for Connecticut) Latimore, Robert Lechmere, Ann (Anne) (wife of Thomas Lechmere, sister of John Winthrop, daughter of the late Wait Wintrhop, niece of the late Hon. Fitzjohn Winthrop, and granddaughter of the late Hon. John Winthrop) Lechmere, Charles (agent for Thomas and Ann Lechmere) Lechmere, Thomas of Boston, merchant (husband of Ann Lechmere) Talcott, John, Governor Wally, Abell Winthrop, Hon. Fitzjohn, late Governor (deceased uncle of John Winthrop and Ann Winthrop Lechmere) Winthrop, Hon. John, late Governor (deceased grandfather of John Winthrop and Ann Winthrop Lechmere) Winthrop, John of New London (brother of Ann Lechmere, son of the late Wait Winthrop, nephew of the late Hon. Fitzjohn Winthrop, and grandson of the late Hon. John Winthrop) Winthrop, Major-General Wait of Boston (deceased father of John Winthrop and Ann Winthrop Lechmere) |
Description |
Land dispute between a brother and sister following the death of their father intestate. As Smith describes, at issue was the validity of the 1699 Connecticut Act for the Settlement of Intestate Estates, which, contrary to English practice, divided real and personal property in equal shares among the intestate’s children with the eldest son receiving a double share. |
Disposition |
Colonial “Act for the Settlement of Intestate Estates declared null and void as contrary to the laws of England in regard it makes Lands of Inheritance distributable as personal Estates . . . . ” |
Notes |
According to Smith (p.537), “the only instance we have seen of a colonial act specifically declared null and void ab initio upon judicial review by the King in Council.” Washburne, Imperial Control, p.184, notes that three appeals are usually cited as involving the validity of colonial legislative enactments: Winthrop v Lechmere, Philips v Savage, and Clark v Towsey. The importance of this case warrants its more detailed exposition here. |
References in Smith, Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations |
Table of Cases (Winthrop v Lechmere) (extensive discussion) |
|
DOCUMENTATION |
Printed Cases |
Not found |
Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew |
TNA Document | Complaint of J. Winthrop – his petition – 8 Feb. 1727 – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.173–178 |
TNA Document | Complaint of J. Winthrop – his petition (typed copy) – 8 Feb. 1727 – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.173–178; this typewritten copy of the petition has been added to the bundle. |
TNA Document | Order of reference – 8 Feb. 1727 – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.173–178 |
TNA Document | Committee report for a copy of the petition to be sent to the Governor for his answer – 18 Feb. 1727 – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.178 |
TNA Document | Governor Talcott’s answer (copy 1) – 19 Sept. 1727 – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.178–181 |
TNA Document | Governor Talcott’s answer (copy 2) – 19 Sept. 1727 – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.178–181 |
TNA Document | Enclosure with Governor Talcott’s answer (copy 1) – 19 Sept. 1727 (certification date) – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.178–181 |
TNA Document | Enclosure with Governor Talcott’s answer (copy 2) – 19 Sept. 1727 (certification date) – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC v.6 [367] p.178–181 |
TNA Document | Letters of 23 Feb. 1698 and 24 Apr. 1699 (copy 1) – 19 Sept. 1727 – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.181 |
TNA Document | Letters of 23 Feb. 1698 and 24 Apr. 1699 (copy 2) – 19 Sept. 1727 – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.181 |
TNA Document | Paragraph in a Connecticut law re houses and land to heirs (copy 1) – 19 Sept. 1727 – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.181 |
TNA Document | Paragraph in a Connecticut law re houses and land to heirs (copy 2) – 19 Sept. 1727 – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.181 |
TNA Document | Order referring Governor’s answer to the Committee – 4 Dec. 1727 (Dorse says Dec. 4, 1728) – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.181 |
TNA Document | List of papers re Winthrop’s complaint – no date – PC 1/48/23 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [367] p.181 |
TNA Document | Complaint of J. Winthrop – extracts from the record of the colony authenticated by the Governor – 16 July 1728 – PC 1/48/24 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [410] p.200 |
TNA Document | Law for dividing the estates of intestates – Board of Trade report on the petition of J. Belcher and J. Dummer – 31 Dec. 1730 – PC 1/48/26 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [431] p.215–216 |
TNA Document | Law of inheritance in case of intestacy – 6 Feb. 1731 – PC 1/48/27 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6, [431] p.216 |
Other Documents |
Other Documents | Winthrop’s printed case was written on 13 folios of 2 foolscap pages each. It was transcribed and printed at the end of the 19th century but the original cannot be located at present. |
|
Other Documents | Printed in the Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society (1892) under the general heading ‘Winthrop, “Brief”’ are: |
|
(1) the brief of the appellant (p.440–496), |
(2) the decree of the King in Council (p.496–509), and |
(3) correspondence from Winthrop (p.509–511). |
Other Documents | See also the Appendix (p.571–579) to Hoadley, Connecticut Public Records 1726–1735, for the text of the Order in Council. |
|