Appeals to the Privy Council |
Report No. 13_1703_00 |
|
Virginia |
Case Name Short |
Selden v Beverley Ballard v Beverley |
Case Name Long |
Samuel Selden v Robert Beverley Francis Ballard on the demise of Samuel and Rebecca Selden v Robert Beverley |
Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series |
APC Citation | v.2 [909] p.446 – 18 November 1703 – entry 1 |
PC Register Citation | Anne v.1 (8 March 1702 – 18 January 1704) p.459–460: PC 2/79/459–460 |
APC Citation | v.2 [909] p.446 – 23 December 1703 – entry 2 |
PC Register Citation | Anne v.1 (8 March 1702 – 18 January 1704) p.481: PC 2/79/481 |
APC Citation | v.2 [909] p.446 – 18 January 1704 – entry 3 |
PC Register Citation | Anne v.1 (8 March 1702 – 18 January 1704) p.512–513: PC 2/79/512–513 |
APC Citation | v.2 [909] p.446 – 20 January 1704 – entry 4 |
PC Register Citation | Anne v.2 (20 January 1704 – 29 September 1705) p.3–4: PC 2/80/3–4 |
APC Citation | v.2 [909] p.446–447 – 3 February 1704 – entry 5 |
PC Register Citation | Anne v.2 (20 January 1704 – 29 September 1705) p.48: PC 2/80/48 |
APC Citation | v.2 [909] p.447 – 10 February 1704 – entry 6 |
PC Register Citation | Anne v.2 (20 January 1704 – 29 September 1705) p.55: PC 2/80/55 |
Colonial Courts |
Court of Virginia |
Participants |
Ballard, Francis (lessee of Samuel Selden) Beverley, Robert Selden, Rebecca (wife of Samuel Selden) Selden, Samuel (husband of Rebecca Selden and lessor of Francis Ballard) |
Description |
Land (“proceedings . . . touching two plantations of lands” [Selden], “petition . . . of the lessee of Samuel Selden, and Rebecca his wife on behalf of himself and the said lessors, complaining of proceedings . . . touching two plantations of lands,” [Ballard]) |
Disposition |
Council advises reversal but leaves parties at liberty to try cause again in Virginia and to appeal upon a special verdict. |
Notes |
On the original actions involved here, see Additional Research. APC, v.2 [1240] p.702, notes an appeal of Robert Beverley (spelled Beverly) to which an appearance for Samuel Selden (spelled Seldon) was made. (Beverly v Seldon, Report No. 13_1715_00.) This may relate to the litigation here between these parties, but further investigation has not been made to verify that. Beverley’s petition for writ of attaint (somewhat puzzling in this context, granted that Ballard is also complaining about the result below) is dismissed on the advice of the Attorney General. See TNA Documents. |
References in Smith, Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations |
Table of Cases (Selden v Beverly) |
|
DOCUMENTATION |
Printed Cases |
Not found |
Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew |
TNA Document | Order of reference (Beverley v Ballard) – 3 Feb. 1704 – PC 1/46/6 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [115] p.28 |
TNA Document | Petition (Beverley v Ballard) – no date – PC 1/46/6 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [115] p.28 |
TNA Document | Attorney General opinion (Beverley v Ballard) – read 10 Feb. 1704 – PC 1/46/6 | view_Document |
Notes about Document |
Referenced in APC, v.6 [115] p.28. Date is from dorse which references the Attorney General opinion only. |