Appeals to the Privy Council from the
Caribbean and Canadian Colonies
Report No. ANT_1725_02

Proctor v Bondinot

Antigua 

 

Case Name Long

Samuel Proctor and James Barton (later William Barton) v Magdalen Bondinot

 
 

Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series

view_APC

APC Citation  

v.3 [87] p.119–120 (6 July 1725 – 15 Aug. 1728)

 
  PC Register Citation

George I v.5 (Sept. 1724 – May 1727) p.89, 91, 102, 277, 329–330, 339, 357: PC 2/89/89, 91, 102, 277, 329–330, 339, 357

view

  PC Register Citation

George II v.1 (14 June 1727 – 22 May 1729) p.350–351, 360: PC 2/90/350–351, 360

view

 

Colonial Courts

 
 

Chancery – 22 May 1723

 

Participants

Barton, James, planter, appellant (administrator of Henry Guchinot)

 

Barton, William, appellant (administrator of Henry Guchinot)

 

Bondinot, John, deceased (husband of Magdalen)

 

Bondinot, Magdalen, respondent (widow and executrix of John, daughter of Henry Guichinot)

 

Clark, Thomas, witness

 

Guichinot, Henry, deceased

 

Proctor, Samuel, planter, appellant (administrator of Henry Guichinot)

 
 

Vessels

 
 

Cleopatra (ship)

 

Description

Inheritance (marriage portion).

Disposition

Appeal initially dismissed with costs for non-prosecution, later admitted (but award of costs confirmed); Chancery decree reversed as to the marriage portion.

Notes

Participants not mentioned in the APC were added here for clarity. Information about these participants was obtained from related primary and other sources.

 

References in Smith, Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations

Table of Cases (Barton v Bondinot)


DOCUMENTATION

Printed Cases

Not found

 

Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew

 
TNA Document Petition and Order of reference – 6 July 1725 (PC 1/58/3) view_Document
Catalogued as

Antigua, West Indies: Order referring to Appeals Committee petition of Magdalen Bondinot, widow, for dismissing appeal of Samuel Proctor and James Barton for non-prosecution

 
Notes about
Document
The catalogue dates the order of reference to May of 1725, but the document itself is dated 6 July 1725, and the corresponding entry in the PC Register is also dated 6 July.

 

TNA Document Committee report (Barton v Bondinot) – 18 Feb. 1727 (PC 1/48/23) view_Document
Notes about
Document
Referenced in APC v.6 [368] p.181.

view_APC

TNA Document Committee report (Barton v Bondinot) – 26 July 1728 (PC 1/48/24) view_Document
Notes about
Document
Referenced in APC v.6 [396] p.193.

view_APC