Appeals to the Privy Council
Report No. MON_1769_00

Scandret v White

Montserrat 

 

Case Name Long

George Scandret and William Anderton v Michael White and Harry Webb

 

Acts of the Privy Council, Colonial Series

view_APC

APC Citation  

v.5 [131] p.216–217 (29 Nov. 1769 – 19 July 1771)

 
PC Register Citation  

George III v.7 (May 1769 – Dec. 1770) p.155, 411: PC 2/114/155, 411

view  

PC Register Citation  

George III v.8 (Jan. 1771 – Dec. 1771) p.29, 314–315, 342: PC 2/115/29, 314–315, 342

view  

Colonial Courts

Chancery – 2 March 1769

Participants

Anderton, William, appellant (executor of Samuel Martin)

Daly, John

French, Nathaniel, deceased

Lynch, Michael

Mackinnen, William (executor of Nathaniel French)

Martin, Samuel, deceased (executor of Nathaniel French)

Scandret, George, appellant (executor of Samuel Martin)

Webb, Harry, respondent

White, Michael, respondent

Description

Dispute over payment due, arising from a difference between two appraisements.

Disposition

Affirmed.


DOCUMENTATION

Printed Cases

Appellant’s
case

Case of the appellant (George Scandret and William Anderton v Michael White)

Counsel

Wm. De Grey; Al. Wedderburn

 
Library

Columbia University. Diamond Law Library: (William Samuel Johnson Collection) Treasure – Johnson 1770m and Microfilm – AA70 (Printed date on dorse 1770. One manuscript note)

view

Privy Council Documents in PC 1 at The National Archives at Kew

TNA Document Committee report (Scandret and Anderton v White) – 9 July 1771 (PC 1/55/67) view_Document
Notes about
Document
Referenced in APC v.6 [868] p.504–505

view_APC