| Appeals to the Privy Council |
 |
List of Images Held by the Ames Foudation |
This page provides links to images that the Ames Foundation has made from items in its possession, has made in libraries or archives that do not have a separate page for images, or has downloaded of items believed to be in the public domain. In the case of the last two, a note indicates the source of the image. The images are in some cases divided by page and in others contained in a single PDF document. In the former case, clicking on any of the page links below will bring you to an image of the page listed embedded in an HTML frame. You can navigate between the pages either by using the arrows at the top and bottom of the image frame or by returning to this page, which will remain in a separate tab or window. The images are large, so that the small print can be read. For the PDFs, clicking on the link below will bring you directly to the relevant PDF. You may download and use a single copy of the image only for purposes of private study, research, or teaching. Any other use requires the permission of the Ames Foundation and of the entity listed in the source note. Ames Foundation images are copyright © 2016–2018 by the Ames Foundation. They are provided for private, non-commercial, research, and teaching purposes only. |
|
Report No. BAR_1730_00 |
Andrews v Le Gay Andrews v Moseley Andrews v Young |
Barbados |
| Other Documents | For the conciliar arguments in Morris v Le Gay, Smith refers readers to a document in the Wedderburn papers at Lincoln’s Inn Library. We are grateful to the Librarian of Lincoln’s Inn Library for providing us with the images that we display here. They are reproduced with permission of the Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn. |
| Library | Ames Foundation: (33 pages) (Source: Lincoln’s Inn Library, Wedderburn papers, MS Misc 378, 57-89 [reversing volume]) |
Ames: p.57–89 |
| Other Documents | See Colson v Colson, referencing “Morris versus Wood, at the Cockpit, a plantation cause . . . held to be an estate tail by Lord Chief Justice Raymond and Eyres.” 2 Atk. 247, 249, 26 Eng. Rep. 553, 554 (Ch. 1741). |
| Library | Ames Foundation: (4 pages) (Source: HeinOnline [available by subscription]) |
Ames: 26 Eng. Rep. 552–555 |
| Other Documents | See also Doe ex dem. Long v Laming discussing “Morris, on the demise of William Andrews and Isaac Le Gay and John Wood (holden to be an estate tail in Lucretia).” 2 Burr. 1100, 1102–1103, 97 Eng. Rep. 731, 732–733 (KB 1760). |
| Library | Ames Foundation: (10 pages) (Source: HeinOnline [available by subscription]) |
Ames: 97 Eng. Rep. 731–740 |
| Other Documents | A fuller discussion of the appeal (styled as Richard Morris Appellant v J. Ward and Others Respondents, from Barbados) by Lord Kenyon, based on notes of the case by Mr. Filmer, can be found in Alpass v Watkins, where the Privy Council result is described as “Lucretia took an estate tail.” 8 T.R. 516, 518–519, 101 Eng. Rep. 1521, 1522–1523 (KB 1800). |
| Library | Ames Foundation: (3 pages) (Source: HeinOnline [available by subscription]) |
Ames: 101 Eng. Rep. 1521–1523 |